Took me a minute to find pictures of her around that size, they’re not the best but she’s probably like 1.5 - 2 here.As per the title can anyone provide a photo of their 1 inch and also 1.5 inch G. pulchra?
I have suspicions on mine that it may be something else.
Thanks in advance to replies.
In these I believe she’s about 0.5 - 1. Hope it helps.As per the title can anyone provide a photo of their 1 inch and also 1.5 inch G. pulchra?
I have suspicions on mine that it may be something else.
Thanks in advance to replies.
Took me a minute to find pictures of her around that size, they’re not the best but she’s probably like 1.5 - 2 here.
It’s a very generic thing that the American side of the hobby seem to want to do. To me it sounds like you want to call your Pulchra a Quirogai so you can say it isn’t from Brazil .No one is coming to your house and taking your spiders. It came up a while back everyone over there was petrified they were going to lose their pokies. The authorities don’t even know who has them, and if they are illegal then they would be illegal this side of the pond aswell. But nothing has been said. Not 1 piece of legislation.
Wow that is one sweet pulchra.
My supposedly pulchra is still hiding in it's burrow. Mine doesn't look anything like this. It's very thin and spindly.
I bought mine at .5 inch from an exotic pet show from a predominantly reptile breeder. This is the problem I didn't know any better at the time I purchased it not to buy tarantulas from reptile breeders.
Mine grew from .5 inch to over 1 inch in 4 months and I don't know or think they grow that fast. I know they are slow growers but I just don't know if that is normal or not.
If you can post a photo of yours I'm sure someone will try to identify it for you.
What makes you think it isn’t a Pulchra?What in the world are you talking about?
I think you replied to the wrong topic.
What makes you think it isn’t a Pulchra?
Well if you bought it as a Pulchra then it’s a Pulchra. When I got my sling it was .5 and black. The female we have is 1.5” and has been brown until now. Even if you find a picture that suits what your looking for it might still be wrong. Until it’s larger it’s what you bought it as. I’m just putting 2 and 2 together as on the other thread you were worried about Brazilian species and now all of a sudden you want someone to tell you your Pulchra isn’t one.Read my replies above. That..... and I did a search first online for g. pulchra spiderling photos which I couldn"t find much on 1 to 1.5 inch photos just quick searching.
Until I can get a photo of mine that is clear I was asking for photos so I can do a comparison now.
Well, not necessarily true...Well if you bought it as a Pulchra then it’s a Pulchra.
Well if you bought it as a Pulchra then it’s a Pulchra. When I got my sling it was .5 and black. The female we have is 1.5” and has been brown until now. Even if you find a picture that suits what your looking for it might still be wrong. Until it’s larger it’s what you bought it as. I’m just putting 2 and 2 together as on the other thread you were worried about Brazilian species and now all of a sudden you want someone to tell you your Pulchra isn’t one.
You misunderstood what I meant. We’ve had Ts change species too. What I’m saying is if something is a small generic sling then it’s what it was purchased as until you can identify it.Well, not necessarily true...
We bought a 1/2" G. rosea sling and it proved female at it's last molt. Here she is today.
Anyone think this is G rosea?
View attachment 47691
Not a pic for the OP, nor G pulchra
Thanks Casey for the photos. Mine didn't and does not currently look like yours.
It is a challenge to get a photo of mine. When it came out I tried to get my camera positioned for a decent photo and it bolted fast inside it's burrow.
I'm not giving up, I am determined to photo this little booger head.