• Are you a Tarantula hobbyist? If so, we invite you to join our community! Once you join you'll be able to post messages, upload pictures of your pets and enclosures and chat with other Tarantula enthusiasts. Sign up today!

Genius tarantulas?

Stan Schultz

Active Member
3 Year Member
Messages
102
Location
Anywhere in North America.
One and All -
I am starting this thread as an extension of the Ping Pong Balls thread. But I have an ulterior motive. I am still working on the fourth edition of The Tarantula Keeper's Guide (a.k.a., TKG4. And yes, it's been a long time coming), and am trying to amass enough scientific and anecdotal content to include a chapter on tarantula intelligence. What started out as a ping pong ball curiosity (actually several decades ago) is beginning to look more and more like a new and completely unexpected property of these amazing spiders.

This basic question is, "Are tarantulas intelligent?" (detecting its existence in the first place). And this opens up a whole bunch of supplementary questions and concerns like, "What is intelligence?" (a basic, working definition), "How can we detect or measure different kinds of intelligence?" (a qualitative assessment), and "How can we detect and compare different levels of intelligence?" (a quantitative assessment). But these questions probably have already been discussed, maybe even answered, ad nauseam in the scientific or professional literature.

Here are a few examples to whet your interest:
1) The ping pong ball phenomenon responsible for starting this thread suggests some level of intelligence, and has been proposed to explain why the tarantula "plays" with the ping pong ball.

But the naysayers insist that this behavior is just instinct. The tarantula is merely attempting to rid its environment of this foreign object. However, that still implies that the tarantula is perceiving a difference between a foreign object and a non-foreign object (e.g., a decorative pebble or rock). And there is still the strong argument that the ability to discern such a difference and make a choice of several options (e.g., move it or ignore it) strongly suggests some level of intelligence.

2) Handling ("manipulation" in TKG3). In the wild, when something reaches out to pick up or grab a tarantula, it's usually in an attempt to eat it. Thus, evolution has bestowed an instinctive "flight or fight" reaction to most multicellular organisms under most such circumstances, tarantulas included.

But enter the tarantula! It turns out that a truly surprising number of kinds of tarantulas will learn to overcome that instinctive response, and substitute a very benign, submissive reaction, especially if it's accompanied by a nice, gentle, belly rub! The point here is that the spider has LEARNED a completely counterintuitive reaction, and that strongly suggests intelligence at some level.

3) A few enthusiasts have reported that their tarantulas actually learned to come to the front of their cages either by sensing vibrations or the tapping made by their keepers on the cages, or by sight (even though the common wisdom insists that tarantulas can't see that well) when the enthusiast enters the room, turns on the lights, or otherwise makes their presence known.

So, I need several things from you:
1) Examples of tarantulas' behaviors that you can personally vouch for that might strongly suggest the existence of some level of tarantula intelligence, however meager. For instance, have you noticed that your little wonder-pet performs the same activity repeatedly under similar conditions, perhaps that would otherwise not be unexpected?

2) GENTLY experiment with some of your tarantulas to see if you can teach them to do some very elementary tricks like raising their front legs in acknowledgement or greetings if you gently tap their cages or flash a light at them. (Hint: The word on the street is that tarantulas will respond to a little food incentive. Bribery apparently works in their world the same as in ours!)

There is one important caution here: I STRONGLY urge you to NOT try any of this on any of the Old World species for at least two reasons:
1) Many of these tarantulas have strong "negative" personalities that would make your teaching them or their learning difficult or nearly impossible. At the level at which we're doing these experiments we don't need to stack the cards that badly in our disfavor.

2) Many of the Old World tarantulas have potent, even "medically significant" venoms. There is no advantage to risking your health and safety in the pursuit I've outlined here.

And one last point: Please do not beleaguer us with idle fairy tales! There's already too much objectionable "stuff" floating around the Internet and elsewhere. We really don't need any more.

Now we get to do something meaningful and fun with our little buddies!

Stan
 

Phototoxin

Member
Messages
60
Location
Ireland
I will repeat my anecdote from the pingpong thread.

My old g.rosea (aka 'Spidey Girl') who was received as an adult - so age unknown. She lived in a cup with the handle broken off and seemed to prefer it to a burrow which had a semi-circle of cork over it.

On the opposite side to the cup-lair was a water dish and a yellow ping-pong ball. As tarantulas seem want to do she would often linger or hover over an empty water dish. When I opened the lid to add water or food I would sometimes move the ball with my tongs. Her legs weren't on the ball until I went to move it with the tongs. Most of the time she put her front right (as she would be facing me and the ball was on my left/her right) leg onto the pingpong ball. If I tried to nudge it away she seemed to pull/roll it back in and we could go back and fourth a couple of times. If she persisted I let her 'keep' it.


I had an a.geniculata who sadly died in moult before I could introduce a ping pong ball.

I currently have 3 g.pulchripes whom I'm planning to introduce balls to once they get a bit bigger. They seem quite 'chilled' and haven't ever flicked so I'm hoping this docility will continue as they realise that they are under no threat.

Also with regards to intelligence: bees are smaller, probably have smaller nerve ganglia and I believe it has been demonstrated that they can navigate by the sun, communicate via dancing and count to 4. Ants count their steps to figure out how far they've travelled etc.
So it wouldn't surprise me if we stripped away the 'scary predator' factor of spiders that we would learn how smart they are.

As an aside (sorry this reply is so long!) on the topic of 'intelligence':
I always say to people when they ask if the spider will bite; the spider doesn't 'want' to bite you, you are bigger and more scary, the bite will just annoy you rather than kill you and as a result you probably will kill the spider. If a spider bites you it probably because it 'feels' like it has no other option to survive.

Now I know this is anthropomorphising the spider to an extent. I don't think spiders want to bite any more than I want to bite a sandwich. It's just part of the process of me surviving (by eating my sandwich). Similarly I don't think the spider feels on a higher level that it has no other option, but rather evolution/instinct and possibly experience has taught it that sometimes if it bites the big thing, the big thing will be startled and thus the spider can get away.

I guess you have your work cut out for you in differentiating learned behaviour from innate/instinctive behaviour!
 

WolfSpider

Well-Known Member
1,000+ Post Club
3 Year Member
Messages
1,155
Location
Florida
I dunno about intelligence, but my P. regalis does a neat trick once per week. When she was a juvie and I was a noob, I was afraid of her. I opened her cage and threw a cricket in, trying to stay away from her. Quickly I noticed that she would catch the incoming cricket out of the air in her fangs. I thought it was so cool that long after I lost fear of her, I still played catch with her in this way.
Anyway I wonder how she does it. Her vision is not supposed to be good. I can't imagine that a fluttering cricket that has not touched any aspect of her cage or her webs can invoke a typical vibratory response that she would recognize as incoming prey. Yet, unless she is in pre molt, she does it regularly. However she does it, I am amazed by her accuracy and the speed of her twitch response. No other T I have had in 7 years has done this before.
 

MBullock

Well-Known Member
3 Year Member
Messages
679
Location
Arizona
I dunno about intelligence, but my P. regalis does a neat trick once per week. When she was a juvie and I was a noob, I was afraid of her. I opened her cage and threw a cricket in, trying to stay away from her. Quickly I noticed that she would catch the incoming cricket out of the air in her fangs. I thought it was so cool that long after I lost fear of her, I still played catch with her in this way.
Anyway I wonder how she does it. Her vision is not supposed to be good. I can't imagine that a fluttering cricket that has not touched any aspect of her cage or her webs can invoke a typical vibratory response that she would recognize as incoming prey. Yet, unless she is in pre molt, she does it regularly. However she does it, I am amazed by her accuracy and the speed of her twitch response. No other T I have had in 7 years has done this before.
Pokies actually likely do have at least limited eyesight, IMO. We all assumed scorpions and solifugae were blind but that ended up being wrong.

Some scorpions actually have much better eyesight than others, to the point where there are a few diurnal species that wander around happily in broad daylight in the middle of the afternoon. parabuthus is famous for this, particularly parabuthus villosus.
 

Stan Schultz

Active Member
3 Year Member
Messages
102
Location
Anywhere in North America.
... So, I need several things from you:
1) Examples of tarantulas' behaviors that you can personally vouch for that might strongly suggest the existence of some level of tarantula intelligence, however meager. For instance, have you noticed that your little wonder-pet performs the same activity repeatedly under similar conditions, perhaps that would otherwise not be unexpected?

It's sometimes considered bad manners to reply to your own postings, but I think that this time it might be tolerated. In the above paragraph, quoted from my original post in this thread, there is a serious mistake, a double negative, that contradicts itself. The last phrase in the last sentence should read "... perhaps that would otherwise not be expected?"

My typo was the result of incomplete editing due to too much impatience and haste. Sorry if it caused anyone any confusion.

Stan
 

Stan Schultz

Active Member
3 Year Member
Messages
102
Location
Anywhere in North America.
I will repeat my anecdote from the pingpong thread.

My old g.rosea (aka 'Spidey Girl') who was received as an adult - so age unknown. She lived in a cup with the handle broken off and seemed to prefer it to a burrow which had a semi-circle of cork over it. ...

Several years ago on another forum, this behavior was suggested as being a misplaced or mal-placed maternal instinct, much as a brooding, mother hen incubating golf balls or ceramic eggs. Did 'Spidey Girl' ever try to push the ping pong ball towards you? Do anything else that couldn't be explained by the "brooding hen" hypothesis?

I currently have 3 g.pulchripes whom I'm planning to introduce balls to once they get a bit bigger. They seem quite 'chilled' and haven't ever flicked so I'm hoping this docility will continue as they realise that they are under no threat. ...



Do not do the following with any Old World tarantula, or with any tarantula that is suspected of, or known to have a "medically significant" venom. All of the really common, docile kinds of pet tarantulas are probably safe. With these, if you are ever actually bitten (very, very small chance), at the very most you'll have something interesting to tell your grand-kids!

If you are ever bitten, treat the bite wound as you would any other cut or puncture (wash well, use an antiseptic, apply a small bandage). If after a few days it looks as though it's infected, go to a doctor. If there is significant or alarming pain and swelling go to an emergency clinic.

Be sure to always go back, offer your tarantula another cricket, and apologize for being such a boorish dunce.

Tarantulas' pedipalps and first and second pair of legs are carpeted by a layer of bristles, many or most of which are chemo-sensitive. Think of them as being combined noses and taste-buds. The hypothesis is that tarantulas can learn to recognize you, and differentiate you from rubber gloves or forceps by your odor. This might be (note the qualifier!) the dominant mechanism that they use for deciding that being picked up by you is okay, but not so much by the family cat!




I guess you have your work cut out for you in differentiating learned behaviour from innate/instinctive behaviour!

1) Ah-ha! The British spelling (behaviour)! What country are you in/from?

I'm currently in western Canada, a small farming community called Rockyford in Alberta. Population 377 counting the dogs, and my two tarantulas. In about two weeks I'll be leaving for the Sunbelt of the USA (probably New Mexico this year) to overwinter with the tarantulas. I'm retired, an RVer (live full-time in a motorhome), and am a snowbird (see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Snowbird_(person)).

2) Re:"work cut out..." Yah. I have a reputation for doing unwise or difficult things. The good news is that I'm actually successful every now and again!

Everybody...
We need to hear more from the rest of you, too!

Stan
 
Last edited by a moderator:

MBullock

Well-Known Member
3 Year Member
Messages
679
Location
Arizona
One problem here.. if you're tapping the substrate it's a little redundant since you're already ringing a dinner bell by opening the lid. You may be training your spider to kill any male you attempt to introduce.
 

Stan Schultz

Active Member
3 Year Member
Messages
102
Location
Anywhere in North America.
One problem here.. if you're tapping the substrate it's a little redundant since you're already ringing a dinner bell by opening the lid. You may be training your spider to kill any male you attempt to introduce.

No, no, no! Sorry, but you're not reading it correctly. I quote:

"...always tap three times lightly on the front of the cage to announce your presence..."

Stan
 

MBullock

Well-Known Member
3 Year Member
Messages
679
Location
Arizona
Your tarantulas actually already know you're there before you touch the enclosure, too. you might not even have to touch the enclosure but merely say something loud enough for them to feel with vibrations alone. They do after all communicate that way
 

Tomoran

Well-Known Member
3 Year Member
Tarantula Club Member
Messages
800
Location
Connecticut
My prediction is that, if you try to hand feed a tarantula a cricket once day like this ...

1)The first few days it may either run and hide, or turn and bare its fangs. If so, merely drop the cricket on the substrate in front of the tarantula, and beat a hasty retreat. Try again tomorrow.

2) Within a week or ten days some of them will settle down enough to let you drop the cricket in front of them, which they will soon learn to eat.

3) Within a few more days, my prediction has them willingly turn to take the cricket from your fingers.

4) Once they readily accept a hand-held cricket from you, don't get so close. Make them take a half step or two to reach the cricket. Soon you should have them walking halfway across the cage for the treat!

... then you, too, will have become a tarantula whisperer!
Hey, Stan. First of all, HUGE respect for you and what you've done for the community. I've been eagerly awaiting the newest edition of this book for YEARS, and I was just commenting to my wife the other night that I hoped that you hadn't abandoned the project. When I noticed this post, I couldn't help but get excited.

Although I appreciate the idea of including a bit about tarantula/spider intelligence, I really worry that a bunch of anecdotal stories about their supposed "learned" behavior will only further encourage folks to anthropomorphize these animals. I spend a lot of time talking to new keepers (which will likely be the targeted audience of this new edition), and they already struggle with understanding that these animals are not dogs or cats. I could fill a page with all of the crazy things that hobbyists have done with their tarantulas because they honestly believe that the animals are bonded with them (or, are showing emotional intelligence). These situations can put both the keeper and the animals at risk.

I could definitely see you including a chapter that draws on some of the scientific studies that have already been done in terms of arachnid intelligence, and maybe mentioning that some folks have seen evidence that there is more going on with them than we think. However, anything else would be pure conjecture and, quite frankly, could do more harm than good. As much as you want to warn that you shouldn’t be hands-on with old world species, there are folks out there who will not differentiate. After all, if you’re saying that tarantulas can learn to accept human contact, then wouldn’t it stand to reason that ANY tarantula could be “tamed” in this manner? Many will come to this conclusion.

If I’m reading the above quote correctly, you are proposing that folks could teach their spiders to eat from their fingers? I’m sorry, but this is beyond irresponsible. I’m not going to wade into the whole handling debate, because I can honestly see both sides. But I’ve fed enough tarantulas over the years to recognize that this type of “experiment” is just a bite waiting to happen. Even the most “docile” beginner species can have excellent feeding responses and can overshoot their targets. One of the reasons that we don’t encourage tong feeding is because the spiders will often miss the prey and strike the tongs. Putting your fingers mere millimeters from those fangs is just asking for trouble.

Maybe you’re just putting it up as a “what if?” scenario, but people respect you and your work, and some will take this as a call to arms to prove that you can hand-feed a tarantula. Why encourage folks to knowingly put themselves in situations that can EASILY result in bites? They’re not toys, and you should not be treating them like dogs with biscuits. If someone WERE to attempt something like this, it should be attempted in a lab environment with safety precautions to prevent the feeder from getting bit. It should not be attempted by a bunch of hobbyists at home...hobbyists who might not yet have the background knowledge to appreciate the danger they are putting themselves in.

Again, perhaps you were just floating this by as a dream experiment, but there are still going to be folks who read this and attempt it. And for what? For what will amount to a fun, throw away chapter that will lack credibility due to the anecdotal nature of it (at best), or result in new keepers unwittingly putting themselves in harm's way (at worst)? At the end of the day, the new TKG should be a bible for folks looking to get into this amazing hobby that want to learn how to keep both themselves and their spiders safe and healthy, right?

Obviously, I’m still looking forward to the TKG4, as I think that a volume with updated husbandry and info is desperately needed. I just hope that the material doesn’t get too clouded with information that encourages new keepers to experiment with or anthropomorphize their animals. These amazing animals deserve our respect; afterall, they are not domesticated animals and they are not toys.
 

Arachnoclown

Well-Known Member
1,000+ Post Club
3 Year Member
Tarantula Club Member
Messages
6,379
Location
The Oregon rain forest
I'm a new world...come hand feed me.
20181221_140200_1.gif
 

octanejunkie

Well-Known Member
1,000+ Post Club
3 Year Member
Tarantula Club Member
Messages
4,166
@Stan Schultz props to you and all the good work you've done in and for the hobby. Keep your updated tomes coming, sir!

@Tomoran speakers the truth. People tend to project on others what they want from the relationship. We do this with humans and animals alike. The best training for a tarantula as a pet, IMO, is keeping an aquarium. While the fish may react to your presence and rituals, they do not know you, love you or need you - and you can't handle them like a cat or dog. Keeping a tarantula is very much the same as keeping an aquarium with one exception, the big box of water.

Sadly, for the dog and cat crowd, a tarantula will never love you and respond with joy at your arrival; but if you can be content with observing and keeping them successfully you'll be rewarded with a healthy and long-lived tarantula. And you won't get bitten doing dumb stuff.
 

MBullock

Well-Known Member
3 Year Member
Messages
679
Location
Arizona
You'd probably have more fun experimenting with araneomorph intelligence, IMO. Wolf spiders are a great candidate because you dont expect them to be so smart.
 

goldenpumpkin

Active Member
Messages
135
Location
USA
If someone WERE to attempt something like this, it should be attempted in a lab environment with safety precautions to prevent the feeder from getting bit.
This has me wondering if there exists such a thing as tarantula-proof gloves, lol. I'm not sure what else would be able to help prevent a bite in that scenario D: Side note: I greatly admire both you and Stan Schultz so its really cool to get to see a conversation between two of the "greats"!
 

WolfSpider

Well-Known Member
1,000+ Post Club
3 Year Member
Messages
1,155
Location
Florida
Hey, Stan. First of all, HUGE respect for you and what you've done for the community. I've been eagerly awaiting the newest edition of this book for YEARS, and I was just commenting to my wife the other night that I hoped that you hadn't abandoned the project. When I noticed this post, I couldn't help but get excited.

Although I appreciate the idea of including a bit about tarantula/spider intelligence, I really worry that a bunch of anecdotal stories about their supposed "learned" behavior will only further encourage folks to anthropomorphize these animals. I spend a lot of time talking to new keepers (which will likely be the targeted audience of this new edition), and they already struggle with understanding that these animals are not dogs or cats. I could fill a page with all of the crazy things that hobbyists have done with their tarantulas because they honestly believe that the animals are bonded with them (or, are showing emotional intelligence). These situations can put both the keeper and the animals at risk.

I could definitely see you including a chapter that draws on some of the scientific studies that have already been done in terms of arachnid intelligence, and maybe mentioning that some folks have seen evidence that there is more going on with them than we think. However, anything else would be pure conjecture and, quite frankly, could do more harm than good. As much as you want to warn that you shouldn’t be hands-on with old world species, there are folks out there who will not differentiate. After all, if you’re saying that tarantulas can learn to accept human contact, then wouldn’t it stand to reason that ANY tarantula could be “tamed” in this manner? Many will come to this conclusion.

If I’m reading the above quote correctly, you are proposing that folks could teach their spiders to eat from their fingers? I’m sorry, but this is beyond irresponsible. I’m not going to wade into the whole handling debate, because I can honestly see both sides. But I’ve fed enough tarantulas over the years to recognize that this type of “experiment” is just a bite waiting to happen. Even the most “docile” beginner species can have excellent feeding responses and can overshoot their targets. One of the reasons that we don’t encourage tong feeding is because the spiders will often miss the prey and strike the tongs. Putting your fingers mere millimeters from those fangs is just asking for trouble.

Maybe you’re just putting it up as a “what if?” scenario, but people respect you and your work, and some will take this as a call to arms to prove that you can hand-feed a tarantula. Why encourage folks to knowingly put themselves in situations that can EASILY result in bites? They’re not toys, and you should not be treating them like dogs with biscuits. If someone WERE to attempt something like this, it should be attempted in a lab environment with safety precautions to prevent the feeder from getting bit. It should not be attempted by a bunch of hobbyists at home...hobbyists who might not yet have the background knowledge to appreciate the danger they are putting themselves in.

Again, perhaps you were just floating this by as a dream experiment, but there are still going to be folks who read this and attempt it. And for what? For what will amount to a fun, throw away chapter that will lack credibility due to the anecdotal nature of it (at best), or result in new keepers unwittingly putting themselves in harm's way (at worst)? At the end of the day, the new TKG should be a bible for folks looking to get into this amazing hobby that want to learn how to keep both themselves and their spiders safe and healthy, right?

Obviously, I’m still looking forward to the TKG4, as I think that a volume with updated husbandry and info is desperately needed. I just hope that the material doesn’t get too clouded with information that encourages new keepers to experiment with or anthropomorphize their animals. These amazing animals deserve our respect; afterall, they are not domesticated animals and they are not toys.
Tom, you are such an eloquent spokesman for the hobby. Have
This has me wondering if there exists such a thing as tarantula-proof gloves, lol. I'm not sure what else would be able to help prevent a bite in that scenario D: Side note: I greatly admire both you and Stan Schultz so its really cool to get to see a conversation between two of the "greats"!
ONLY at TF. Can't find this on AB--just sayin'
 

goldenpumpkin

Active Member
Messages
135
Location
USA
Can't find this on AB--just sayin'
Yeah I hope I don't get in trouble for saying this here, but I had a feeling that professionals, researchers, etc wouldn't tolerate the persistently immature negative attitude issues that AB unfortunately has. (And if that is out of line for me to say, I apologize.)
 

WolfSpider

Well-Known Member
1,000+ Post Club
3 Year Member
Messages
1,155
Location
Florida
Yeah I hope I don't get in trouble for saying this here, but I had a feeling that professionals, researchers, etc wouldn't tolerate the persistently immature negative attitude issues that AB unfortunately has. (And if that is out of line for me to say, I apologize.)
No. You are dead on. You will have to ask Tom, Stan or Richard to be sure. I know they draw empiric data from all sites, AB being the biggest and having the most numbers of enthusiasts. But I think it speaks volumes that they each chose to communicate with fellow hobbyists on TF. We, as a community are blessed and grateful.
 

Latest posts

Top