- Messages
- 2,031
- Location
- Norwich, UK
Before Christmas, I sent a local dealer a list of my males who I thought were close to maturing & of my females who I thought were mature, who he could borrow to breed with. I do not breed, so I do not check female molts to see if they are mature. Thus I spent some time, just out of curiosity, looking around at online information, about female tarantula sexual maturity.
Today I came here to find someone had asked about his T. I do not want to confuse that post. As the poster of the question, has very few posts listed on their profile & I don't want to spoil their thread for them, or confuse that thread. But it reminded me of what I think I may have read before Christmas.
My question is.
I do not know where I read it & it may just be in my imagination. But I am positive I read somewhere that, although a female is fully matured when her spermathecae becomes sclerotised, (hardened.) It is possible for some T's to revert to an unsclerotised spermathecae with some molts. Thus a sclerotised spermathecae, is an indication that she was fertile, but it is not a 100% indication that she currently is. I seem to remember it being suggested that this may be natures way of giving her a year off breeding, occasionally. Does anyone know if the above is correct, as google has proved no help.
Today I came here to find someone had asked about his T. I do not want to confuse that post. As the poster of the question, has very few posts listed on their profile & I don't want to spoil their thread for them, or confuse that thread. But it reminded me of what I think I may have read before Christmas.
My question is.
I do not know where I read it & it may just be in my imagination. But I am positive I read somewhere that, although a female is fully matured when her spermathecae becomes sclerotised, (hardened.) It is possible for some T's to revert to an unsclerotised spermathecae with some molts. Thus a sclerotised spermathecae, is an indication that she was fertile, but it is not a 100% indication that she currently is. I seem to remember it being suggested that this may be natures way of giving her a year off breeding, occasionally. Does anyone know if the above is correct, as google has proved no help.